Pacifism is objectively pro-fascist. This is elementary common sense. If you hamper the war effort of one side you automatically help that of the other.
Whenever it was possible we had poems broadcast by the people who wrote them. Just why these particular programmes a small and remote out-flanking movement in the radio war were instituted there is no need to explain here, but I should add that the fact that we were broadcasting to an Indian audience dictated our technique to some extent.
The essential point was that our literary broadcasts were aimed at the Indian university students, a small and hostile audience, unapproachable by anything that could be described as British propaganda. Partisan Review with squalid controversies imported from across the Atlantic, I will lump together the various letters you have sent on to me from Messrs Savage, Woodcock and Comfortas the central issue in all of them is the same.
But I must afterwards deal separately with some points of fact raised in various of the letters. Pacifism is objectively pro-Fascist. This is elementary common sense. If you hamper the war effort of one side you automatically help that of the other.
Nor is there any real way of remaining outside such a war as the present one. The idea that you can somehow remain aloof from and superior to the struggle, while living on food which British sailors have to risk their lives to bring you, is a bourgeois illusion bred of money and security.
That is why pacifist activities are not permitted in those countries in both of them the penalty is, or can be, beheading while both the Germans and the Japanese do all they can to encourage the spread of pacifism in British and American territories.
They would stimulate pacifism in Russia as well if they could, but in that case they have tougher babies to deal with. In so far as it takes effect at all, pacifist propaganda can only be effective against those countries where a certain amount of freedom of speech is still permitted; in other words it is helpful to totalitarianism.
As an ex-Indian civil servant, it always makes me shout with laughter to hear, for instance, Gandhi named as an example of the success of non-violence. As long as twenty years ago it was cynically admitted in Anglo-Indian circles that Gandhi was very useful to the British government.
So he will be to the Japanese if they get there. As far as I can see, no therapy short of complete military defeat has any chance of re-establishing the common stability of literature and of the man in the street. One can imagine the greater the adversity the greater the sudden realization of a stream of imaginative work, and the greater the sudden katharsis of poetry, from the isolated interpretation of war as calamity to the realization of the imaginative and actual tragedy of Man.
When we have access again to the literature of the war years in France, Poland and Czechoslovakia, I am confident that that is what we shall fined. From a letter to Horizon.
I pass over the money-sheltered ignorance capable of believing that literary life is still going on in, for instance, Poland, and remark merely that statements like this justify me in saying that our English pacifists are tending towards active pro-Fascism.
The result of this is that so-called peace propaganda is just as dishonest and intellectually disgusting as war propaganda.
The Fascizing processes occurring in Britain as a result of war are systematically exaggerated.
Discussion of what the world would actually be like if the Axis dominated it is evaded. The fact that the rich everywhere tend to be pro-Fascist and the working class are nearly always anti-Fascist is hushed up.
It is tacitly pretended that the war is only between Britain and Germany. Mention of Russia and China, and their fate if Fascism is permitted to win, is avoided. My past and present.
Mr Woodcock tries to discredit me by saying that a I once served in the Indian Imperial Police, b I have written article for the Adelphi and was mixed up with the Trotskyists in Spain, and c that I am at the B.
With regard to ait is quite true that I served five years in the Indian Police.Pacifism Essays: Over , Pacifism Essays, Pacifism Term Papers, Pacifism Research Paper, Book Reports. ESSAYS, term and research papers available for UNLIMITED access Order plagiarism free custom written essay All essays are written from scratch by professional writers according to your instructions and delivered to your email.
Leading up to and the declaration of war against Germany, the labor unions, socialists, members of the Old Right, and pacifist groups in the United States publicly opposed participation, the obvious motive for the Preparedness Day Bombing stemming from this. Where as pacifism is a principle against this completely.
However, there are four types of pacifism and to an extent you could argue that some of these fit the Just War theory. In this essay I will be comparing and contrasting. Outline the key concepts of Just War and Pacifism. A01  The Just war theory maintains that war may be justified if fought only in certain circumstances, and only if certain restrictions are applied to the way in which war is fought.
On an argument against pacifism. Authors; Authors and affiliations; Michael Martin; Article.
84 Downloads; I would like to thank a referee for Philosophical Studies for helpful comments that I used in revising the paper. This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
|An argument against pacifism||In the memory of the war that would have ended all further wars - "War and violence are unjustifiable, conflicts should be settled in a peaceful way.|
|On this page||The Weight of Glory Publisher: Clive Staples Lewis lived from nearly the turn of the 20th century to the early 's.|
|Why C. S. Lewis Was Wrong About Pacifism | T. C. Moore - leslutinsduphoenix.com||I believe that it is, though I also recognize that arguments in favor of the possibility that at times violence might be appropriate can seem pretty persuasive.|
|BBC - Ethics - War: Pacifism||Famous Pacifists A pacifist is somebody who opposes war and refuses to fight.|
The notion of government in the Bible is probably one of the most controversial when discussing the topic of pacifism, as Romans 13 is often used as a proof text against pacifism.
I highly recommend taking a deeper look at these scriptures on government in my counterrebuttal section on the issue here.